Back

Sunday Decisions · weekly · 2 min

One decision,every Sunday.

One decision. Every Sunday. Written for founders who are ready to stop being the bottleneck in their own business.

Don't trust me. Read the first one ↓

P.S.Reply to any newsletter and it lands in my inbox. I read every one.

Sunday Decisions · Issue 01~2 min read

The hire you keep almost making

You're an owner. You've been almost-making the same senior hire for six weeks.

You wrote the job spec twice. You did one round of intro calls. You told two friends you were hiring. Then nothing.

Here's what's actually happening.

It's not a calendar problem. It's not a market problem. It's not even the candidate. The hire is a proxy for a decision you haven't made about the business yet. Your gut knows it.

Every senior hire answers a question about the next twelve months. Are we doubling down on the channel that built us? Or betting on a new one. Are we still selling to the same buyer? Or trading up. Are we keeping the team flat? Or putting a layer between you and the people who built it with you.

Until you answer that, no candidate fits. Every résumé reads as "almost." Every reference call ends in "good but." You're not interviewing. You're stalling, with a process that looks like work.

Here's the move.

Stop interviewing for two weeks. Take ninety minutes alone, on paper, and finish this sentence: In twelve months, this business is built around ______. One blank. One answer.

The senior hire is whoever runs that sentence.

If the answer is "the same channel, bigger": you're hiring a builder. If it's "a new buyer": you're hiring a closer. If it's "a layer between me and the team": you're hiring an operator, and the spec is wrong. You don't need a VP of anything, you need a number two.

The reason the hire keeps stalling isn't the candidates. It's that you haven't decided which version of the next twelve months you're underwriting.

Decide that this week. The right hire shows up the week after.

— Michael

P.S.: If you read this and the sentence wouldn't finish, that's the call. Reply and tell me what's in the blank. I read every one.

If that landed, the next one's coming Sunday.

↑ Subscribe
Sunday Decisions · Issue 02~2 min read

Right person, wrong seat is the most expensive mistake you're not naming

There's a hire on your team right now you'd describe as loyal, capable, well-liked. And quietly underwater.

You know who I mean. You haven't said it out loud.

Here's the question I ask about every employee, twice a year.

If I started another company today, would I hire this person again for the same role?

One question. Three answers. Three actions.

Yes.

Right person, right seat. Tell them. Most owners forget this part. The people doing the work rarely hear that you'd hire them again on day one of a new company. Say it this week.

Yes, but in a different role.

Right person, wrong seat. This is the answer most owners miss, because it doesn't feel like a problem. It feels like loyalty. It's the most expensive mistake on your team.

A good person in the wrong seat is two losses. You lose the work the seat needs done. And you lose the person, slowly, because no one wants to be quietly bad at their job.

Find them the right seat inside ninety days. Or help them find one outside.

No.

Wrong person. Begin planning their exit this quarter. With dignity, severance, and a runway. Not next quarter.

Swift action is a kindness. Stalling isn't.

Ask the question this week. Write the answer down for every person on your team. The list itself will tell you what to do.

— Michael

P.S.: Reply and tell me which of the three answers came up the most. I read every one.

If that landed, the next one's coming Sunday.

↑ Subscribe
Sunday Decisions · Issue 03~2 min read

Flat is a decision

Revenue has been within ten percent of the same number for eighteen months.

Nothing is broken. The team shows up. Customers renew. You'd call it stable if someone asked.

Flat isn't a plateau. It's a decision you keep re-making every Monday.

Every week you choose the same channel, the same price, the same five accounts, the same meeting cadence. That's a plan. It's just a plan for last year.

Owners think growth stalls because something failed. Usually nothing failed. The business is doing exactly what it was designed to do, and the design hasn't changed since the last time it worked.

Here's the move.

Open your last four quarters of revenue. Find the one thing that produced the most of it. One channel, one customer type, one motion.

Now answer this out loud: what would it take to run that one thing at three times the volume?

Not a new product. Not a rebrand. Not a second market. The thing that already works, three times bigger.

Whatever comes out of your mouth next is your constraint. It's almost always one of four things: not enough people, not enough leads, not enough of your time, or a price that can't carry the extra load.

Name it. Write it on one line. That line is your next ninety days.

Flat businesses aren't short on ideas. They're short on one idea getting all the oxygen.

— Michael

P.S.: Reply with your one line. I'll tell you what I'd do in your seat, whether we work together or not.

If that landed, the next one's coming Sunday.

↑ Subscribe
Sunday Decisions · Issue 04~2 min read

The meeting that can't start without you

Look at last week's calendar. Count the meetings that would have been cancelled if you had been on a plane.

If that number is most of them, you don't have a team. You have a group of people waiting for a ruling.

Here's what's actually happening.

Your people are not confused about the work. They're unclear about the line. They know how to do their job. They don't know how far they can go before they need you.

So they bring you the decision. Every time. It feels like respect. It's really just an unwritten rule that you are the approval layer.

That rule costs you two things. Speed, because nothing moves faster than your calendar. And judgment, because nobody builds it by watching you use yours.

Here's the move.

Pick one recurring meeting this week. The one you're most sure requires you. Do three things before it starts.

Name the owner. One person runs it, by name, out loud, in front of everyone.

Name the number. The one figure that tells them whether the meeting worked.

Name the line. The dollar amount, the discount, the hire, the refund they can decide without calling you. Say the number. Write it down.

Then don't attend. Not late, not on mute in the background. Don't attend.

Read the notes after. You'll see two things: what they got right without you, and the exact spot where the line was too tight.

Move the line. Run it again next week.

You don't delegate work. You delegate the authority to decide. Everything else is just handing out tasks.

— Michael

P.S.: Reply with the meeting you picked and the line you set. I'll tell you if the line is too tight.

If that landed, the next one's coming Sunday.

↑ Subscribe