The hire you keep almost making
You're an owner. You've been almost-making the same senior hire for six weeks.
You wrote the job spec twice. You did one round of intro calls. You told two friends you were hiring. Then nothing.
Here's what's actually happening.
It's not a calendar problem. It's not a market problem. It's not even the candidate. The hire is a proxy for a decision you haven't made about the business yet. Your gut knows it.
Every senior hire answers a question about the next twelve months. Are we doubling down on the channel that built us? Or betting on a new one. Are we still selling to the same buyer? Or trading up. Are we keeping the team flat? Or putting a layer between you and the people who built it with you.
Until you answer that, no candidate fits. Every résumé reads as "almost." Every reference call ends in "good but." You're not interviewing. You're stalling, with a process that looks like work.
Here's the move.
Stop interviewing for two weeks. Take ninety minutes alone, on paper, and finish this sentence: In twelve months, this business is built around ______. One blank. One answer.
The senior hire is whoever runs that sentence.
If the answer is "the same channel, bigger": you're hiring a builder. If it's "a new buyer": you're hiring a closer. If it's "a layer between me and the team": you're hiring an operator, and the spec is wrong. You don't need a VP of anything, you need a number two.
The reason the hire keeps stalling isn't the candidates. It's that you haven't decided which version of the next twelve months you're underwriting.
Decide that this week. The right hire shows up the week after.
— Michael
P.S.: If you read this and the sentence wouldn't finish, that's the call. Reply and tell me what's in the blank. I read every one.
If that landed, the next one's coming Sunday.
↑ Subscribe